Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!uw-beaver!milton!sumax!polari!rwing!seaeast!sunbrk!Usenet
From: Steve.Summit@sunbrk.FidoNet.Org (Steve Summit)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.sysv386
Subject: Re: time(0L) - history of a misconception (was Re: SCO password generat
Message-ID: <675518012.27@sunbrk.FidoNet>
Date: 25 May 91 05:37:25 GMT
Sender: Usenet@sunbrk.FidoNet.Org
Lines: 16

Reply-To: scs@adam.mit.edu

In article <1991May24.151350.22705@holos0.uucp> lbr@holos0.uucp (Len Reed) writes:
>Under what architecture is a NULL pointer not "all bits 0"?

Would it be at all possible for anyone who feels the urge to
contribute to this thread to read the comp.lang.c frequently-
asked questions list first, before posting anything more?  (If
you just joined us, this is a *very* old topic, at least for
comp.lang.c, and nothing new is being said.  If comp.unix.sysv386
finds this fascinating, please remove comp.lang.c from the

                                            Steve Summit
                                            scs@adam.mit.edu

 * Origin: Seaeast - Fidonet<->Usenet Gateway - sunbrk (1:343/15.0)