Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!wuarchive!emory!ogicse!henson!jeff
From: jeff@henson.cc.wwu.edu (Jeff Wandling)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.ultrix
Subject: Re: Run away named "accept: Too many open files" Ultrix 4.1A
Message-ID: <1991May30.225158.12891@henson.cc.wwu.edu>
Date: 30 May 91 22:51:58 GMT
References: <1991May23.001937.2384@neon.Stanford.EDU> <1991May24.212541.13227@forwiss.uni-passau.de>
Organization: Western Washington University
Lines: 38

gengenba@forwiss.uni-passau.de (Michael Gengenbach) writes:

>farhad@Sunburn.Stanford.EDU (Farhad Shakeri) writes:

>>We are having some problem with named under Ultrix 4.1A that is
>>causing a lot of headaches.
>>[...]
>>"May 22 09:34:31 LOCALHOST: 18415 named: accept: Too many open files"

Same here.

[... stuff deleted ...]

>BTW, the DEC service refuses to look into the problem. They say that
>our installation is not supported because the named files are located
>in /etc/namedb and not in /var/dss/namedb and we didn't use bindsetup
>for installation.

We have a 5500 server running Ultrix 4.1 and the situation described is
exactly what we are experiencing here.

The difference is that we *did* use bindsetup for installation and our
named files are located in /var/dss/namedb. Are we entitled to support
from DEC?

>If there is a real solution, let me know.

We would like to know if other sites who used "standard" procedure for
setting up bind are getting any help from DEC.

Is there an e-mail address at DEC for reporting these problems?


-- 
Jeff Wandling
Western Washington University Computer Center
uucp: uw-beaver!henson.cc.wwu.edu!jeff
Internet:  jeff@henson.cc.wwu.edu