Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!unix.cis.pitt.edu!dsinc!netnews.upenn.edu!vax1.cc.lehigh.edu!cert.sei.cmu.edu!krvw
From: padgett%tccslr.dnet@mmc.com (Padgett Peterson)
Newsgroups: comp.virus
Subject: Re: Dead vs Live: Commercial Necessity?? (some philosophizing added.)
Message-ID: <0014.9105301427.AA10625@ubu.cert.sei.cmu.edu>
Date: 29 May 91 16:32:46 GMT
Sender: Virus Discussion List <VIRUS-L@LEHIIBM1>
Lines: 26
Approved: krvw@sei.cmu.edu

>From:    mrs@netcom.com (Morgan Schweers)

>Of course, a fictional bar scene with all the
>principal players would be...frightening.  I picture these ten people
>suddenly realizing who else is at the bar, and the temperature
>dropping twenty to thirty degrees suddenly.

Doubt it, I recall a bar in SEA in which automatic weapons had to be checked
at the door, handguns were OK.

>    (A side and sad note...  It is not us, the anti-viral researchers,
>who will kill the viruses once and for all.  It's the OS writers who
>will finally produce an OS which supports the protections a machine
>needs.  It's the users who will finally leave this damned MS/DOS
>troublemaker behind.  THAT is when viruses will vanish, slowly but
>surely, and then we can all have a beer together and laugh about the
>nonsense of having to clean up behind Microsoft.)

Unlikely that DOS will disappear, it is too much a part of the culture, just
like the English language and SAE screw threads.

However, nothing is stopping DOS from introducing anti-viral measures and
self-checking boot sectors & MBRs. The key is in preservation of the
applications and hardware. It is just not going to be in 5.0.

					Warmly, Padgett