Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ncar!csn!boulder!news!grunwald
From: grunwald@mumble.colorado.edu (Dirk Grunwald)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.interviews
Subject: Re: Declaration of IV library classes
Message-ID: <1991May30.141813.2486@colorado.edu>
Date: 30 May 91 14:18:13 GMT
References: <1991May28.200149.11510@ge-dab.GE.COM> <1991May29.214221.2650@fido.wpd.sgi.com>
Sender: news@colorado.edu (The Daily Planet)
Reply-To: grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu
Organization: University of Colorado at Boulder
Lines: 8
In-Reply-To: linton@marktwain.rad.sgi.com's message of 29 May 91 21:42:21 GMT
Nntp-Posting-Host: mumble.colorado.edu


Is there a reason why data members won't be made 'protected'? I do
this all the time in my class library, but wonder if I'm missing
something that will affect portability, etc.

thanks
Dirk Grunwald -- Univ. of Colorado at Boulder	(grunwald@foobar.colorado.edu)
						(grunwald@cs.colorado.edu)