Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!agate!root
From: echuang@ocf.berkeley.edu (Ernest Chuang)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: ATM vs. Publisher's Powerpak
Message-ID: <1991May28.235322.17424@agate.berkeley.edu>
Date: 28 May 91 23:53:22 GMT
Article-I.D.: agate.1991May28.235322.17424
Sender: root@agate.berkeley.edu (Charlie Root)
Distribution: usa
Organization: ucb
Lines: 9

I don't know if this has already been hashed out before, but can someone
give a comparison between ATM and Publisher's Powerpak?  I'm currently
using ATM, so I know what it can do; I guess I'm mainly interested in
whether PP is significantly better, to make it worth switching to.  
Thanks!

				Ernest Chuang
				echuang@ocf.berkeley.edu
				echuang@cory.berkeley.edu