Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!uunet!infonode!doyled.b23b.ingr!doyle
From: doyle@doyled.b23b.ingr (Doyle C. Davidson)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif
Subject: UIL vs. C code
Keywords: UIL motif C
Message-ID: <1991May30.160724.12989@infonode.ingr.com>
Date: 30 May 91 16:07:24 GMT
Sender: usenet@infonode.ingr.com (Usenet Administrator)
Reply-To: doyle@doyled.b23b.ingr.com
Organization: Intergraph Corporation - Third Party Software
Lines: 35

I am interested in obtaining some objective data about the performance
of Motif 1.1.* UIL (uid) relative to equivalent functionality 
implemented in C.

Some of the things that I want to know is:
    1) what kind of startup (load) impact is there
	(Does XtCreateWidget() overhead outweight disk/UIL overhead?)
    2) what are some limitations with using UIL
	ex:  limited data in callbacks and event handlers
    3) internationalization issues
    4) are there techniques that make some UIL file better than others
    5) can I use my own widgets with UIL
    6) use with respect to "form" builders
    7) anything else that's important

Please respond via email to:
    doyle@ingr.com
	or
    uunet!ingr!doyle
and I will eventually post a summary.

Thanks in Advance!

Doyle
-------------------------------------------------------------------
Doyle C. Davidson              |
Intergraph Corp.               | Intergraph - Everywhere you look!!
Third Party Software           |
1 Madison Industrial Park      |
Huntsville, AL 35806           |  These comments are...
(205) 730-2000                 |
                               |         X-clusively my own.
..!uunet!ingr!doyle            |
- or - doyle@ingr.com          |
-------------------------------------------------------------------