Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!usenet From: John_Graves@cellbio.duke.edu (John Graves) Newsgroups: sci.med.aids Subject: Re: HICN410 News -- excerpts. Message-ID: <1991May28.144110.10846@cs.ucla.edu> Date: 28 May 91 14:33:21 GMT References: <1991May27.154130.19915@cs.ucla.edu> Sender: news@cs.duke.edu Organization: Duke University Medical Center Lines: 34 Approved: phil@wubios.wustl.edu Note: non-commercial reproduction. Nntp-Posting-Host: squid.cs.ucla.edu Archive-Number: 3193 In article <1991May27.154130.19915@cs.ucla.edu> dmcanzi@watserv1.uwaterloo.ca (David Canzi) writes: > AIDS MYSTERY REPORTEDLY SOLVED: > > The mystery of the origin of the world's first known AIDS virus, whose > discovery was claimed by both French and American researchers, has apparently > been solved, according to a report in Sunday's Chicago Tribune. French > scientists at Paris' Pasteur Institute say they are now virtually certain the > virus originated in their laboratories. This is a very confusing posting. Does this mean that HIV was isolated and identified in the French Pasteur Institute first and not be Dr. Robert Gallo at NIH. If so the French claim would not be anything new and instead would be a breaking of previous agreements about joint independent credit for identifying HIV. If on the other hand this does indeed mean that HIV was produced in the Pasteur lab, this would be quite an important admission of guilt for having started this epidemic out of a piece of lab work. I doubt that this is the case but would certainly like more information than obtained in your briefly worded summary. Please explain what this paragraph means both literally and politically. Thanks. John Allan Graves Unitarian Universalism Duke University An inclusive religion! and all its components () including the Divinity School, \__/ disavow anything I say. II