Xref: utzoo comp.sys.next:18377 comp.arch:23057
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!news.larc.nasa.gov!grissom.larc.nasa.gov!kludge
From: kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov ( Scott Dorsey)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.next,comp.arch
Subject: Re: parity is for farmers?
Message-ID: <1991Jun3.173531.6732@news.larc.nasa.gov>
Date: 3 Jun 91 17:35:31 GMT
References: <1991May21.232331.24888@cs.umn.edu> <1991Jun03.040242.15406@ariel.unm.edu>
Sender: news@news.larc.nasa.gov (USENET Network News)
Reply-To: kludge@grissom.larc.nasa.gov ( Scott Dorsey)
Distribution: na
Organization: NASA Langley Research Center
Lines: 13

In article <1991Jun03.040242.15406@ariel.unm.edu> ratshana@triton.unm.edu (R.L.) writes:
>1) Unless you buy really cheap memory, you should NEVER have a problem with
>   screwed up RAM. Besides, if the RAM is screwy, whats the worst that can
>   happen? Your term window dies, so you kill it on another task...

Well, one thing that can happen is that a simulation that is run produces
incorrect output, which is a very curious anomaly.  Someone writes a thesis
to explain that anomaly, then two people write books citing that thesis.
A piece of equipment is constructed based upon the data in one of those books
and it fails, killing someone.  Then a posting is made to comp.risks about
the danger of computer simulations...
--scott
   (the example, incidentally, occurred on a Cyber machine)