Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uunet!digibd!rick
From: rick@digibd.com (Rick Richardson)
Newsgroups: comp.bugs.sys5
Subject: Re: SVR4 /bin/sh BUG
Message-ID: <1991Jun05.054111.27541@digibd.com>
Date: 5 Jun 91 05:41:11 GMT
References: <1991May30.034223.29061@digibd.com> <1991May30.171404.23422@cbnewsl.att.com> <20798@uudell.dell.com>
Organization: DigiBoard Incorporated, Eden Prairie, MN
Lines: 24

jrh@mustang.dell.com (Randy Howard) writes:

>In article <1991May30.171404.23422@cbnewsl.att.com>, urban@cbnewsl.att.com (john.urban) writes:
>|> Your program DOES NOT FAIL on AT&T UNIX System V/386 Release 4.0 Version 2.1.

>Well, that may be true, but the AT&T Release 4.0 Version 3.0 'reference port' 
>or 'Test Engine' as it is sometimes called definitely DOES FAIL.

I just rechecked the bug on our SVR4 Version 2.1 from AT&T and it DOES FAIL.
Which leads me to wonder just how many versions called "2.1" are out there.

I'm also wondering why anyone was messing around with the shell code in
the first place - I mean, if sh is no longer stable, one might as well bite
the bullet and use ksh for the default root shell.

One would hope that the changes made to sh for SVR4 aren't of a major
nature and that the bug can be found simply by diffing the SVR3.2 code
(where it worked) with SVR4.

-Rick
-- 
Rick Richardson		Email: rick@digibd.com
Senior MTS		Fax: (612) 943-0803
DigiBoard, Inc.		Tel: (612) 943-5383