Xref: utzoo comp.dcom.modems:10149 comp.sys.mac.comm:4028
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!casbah.acns.nwu.edu!ucsd!qualcom.qualcomm.com!cancun.qualcomm.com!rdippold
From: rdippold@cancun.qualcomm.com (Ron Dippold)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems,comp.sys.mac.comm
Subject: Re: Summary of 9600 V.32 bis modem info
Message-ID: <1991Jun3.213028.18629@qualcomm.com>
Date: 3 Jun 91 21:30:28 GMT
References: <1CE00001.gxxd0m@tbomb.ice.com>
Sender: news@qualcomm.com
Distribution: na
Organization: Qualcomm, Inc., San Diego, CA
Lines: 18
Nntp-Posting-Host: cancun.qualcomm.com

In article <1CE00001.gxxd0m@tbomb.ice.com> time@ice.com writes:
>
>In article <6913@husc6.harvard.edu>, conrad@popvax.uucp (M20400@c.nobili) writes:
>> Hmmm.  Your "_real_ throughput of about 22K" on "files that were already com-
>> pressed" seems questionable.  I believe your modem supports a maximum link rate
>> of 9,600 bps.  So with a pair of such modems, connected at 9,600 bps and using
>Remember that V.32 (from what I remember) does not need the framing
>bits that 2400 baud uses, giving something on the order of a 20% increase
>in real throughput. If someone knows the details about this, please
>post.

Expected throughput on a V.32 modem with V.42bis is about 1100 cps.  Some
are slightly slower or faster, but that has always been my experience with
ZIPed and ARJed files.


-- 
Standard disclaimer applies, you legalistic hacks.     |     Ron Dippold