Xref: utzoo comp.graphics:18357 news.groups:32550
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!fuug!news.funet.fi!cc.tut.fi!jk87377
From: jk87377@cc.tut.fi (Juhana Kouhia)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics,news.groups
Subject: Re: suspended CVF comp.graphics.interesting (moderated)
Keywords: cgi vote
Message-ID: <1991Jun1.003908.11572@cc.tut.fi>
Date: 1 Jun 91 00:39:08 GMT
References: <1991May31.061130.7782@nntp-server.caltech.edu>
Organization: Tampere University of Technology
Lines: 24


In article <1991May31.061130.7782@nntp-server.caltech.edu>
woolstar@nntp-server.caltech.edu (John D. Woolverton) writes:
>
>   I have mixed feelings about this, but after some consideration,
>I am closing my "early" call for votes comp.graphics.interesting
>for two reasons.

I have wondered why you started that comp.graphics.interesting depate
just after somebody called comp.graphics.research.
You seem not know that there's a discussion time before voting.

>Neither cg.interesting or cg.research seem to be very popular.

Of course comp.graphics.research has not got attention lately, because
we are just waiting the end of the discussion period and then we can
vote for it.
Guess why your voting got so much yes votes?
Lots of people here have not realised the same thing; there's a
discussion period. Maybe they have no patience to wait a voting time.
Neither have you.

When we have that voting time for comp.graphics.research?  June 16? Or?

Juhana Kouhia