Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!pacific.mps.ohio-state.edu!linac!mp.cs.niu.edu!ux1.cso.uiuc.edu!ncsa.uiuc.edu!vjurgens
From: vjurgens@ncsa.uiuc.edu (Vincent Jurgens)
Newsgroups: comp.graphics
Subject: Re: DIGITIZING 35MM SLIDES
Message-ID: <1991Jun4.213954.3936@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu>
Date: 4 Jun 91 21:39:54 GMT
References: <91148.143625ATDYW@ASUACAD.BITNET>
Sender: usenet@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu (News)
Organization: NCSA
Lines: 9

Macworld, June 1991 has a review of flatbed scanners and lists some slide 
scanners.
The Nikon scanner is a very good, hi-resolution, but expensive one.  We 
have one and like it.  But Kodak and Microtek have less expensive models, 
which may work a little faster and do the trick for your application.  
They generate digital files.
Kodaks and others do have the devices which feed built-in cameras, which 
are good, quick and inexpensive if you don't need the resolution and maybe 
already have a frame grabber.