Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!caen!spool.mu.edu!cs.umn.edu!uc!shamash!timbuk!dtj From: dtj@sumac.cray.com (Dean Johnson) Newsgroups: comp.software-eng Subject: Re: Brand New Optimization Methods Message-ID: <150402.23480@timbuk.cray.com> Date: 4 Jun 91 23:31:18 GMT Article-I.D.: timbuk.150402.23480 References: <91154.224250EC13@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK> Reply-To: dtj@sumac.cray.com (Dean Johnson) Organization: Cray Research, Inc. Lines: 53 In article <91154.224250EC13@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK>, EC13@LIVERPOOL.AC.UK writes: |> I am including here some numerical examples solved using the new entropy-based |> methods...... |> |> 1)In Vector Optimization to generate Pareto set: |> ------------------------------------------------ |> This example was taken from 'Multicriterion Optimization in Engineering', |> Osyczka, Ellis Horwood, Chichester, 1984. It is a beam design example. |> |> F1(X) = 0.785{x1 (6400 - x2**2) + (1000 - x1) (10000 - x2**2)} mm^3 ----> Min |> |> F2(X) = 3.298 x 10^(-5) {[(1/(4.096 x 10^6 - x2**4)) - (1/(10^8-x2**4))] * x1^3 |> + (10^9/(10^8 - x2**4))} mm/N ----> Min |> |> S.t.: g1(X) = 180 - 9.87 x 10^6 * x1 / (4.096*10^7 - x2**4) >=0 |> g2(X) = 75.2 - x2 >=0 |> g3(X) = x2 - 40 >=0 |> x1,x2>=o |> Using the 1st entropy-based method, which can generate convex solutions only, |> I was able to obtain 18 solutions while using the 2nd entropy-based method I |> was able to generate 53 solutions. The results are summarized below: |> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |> The Entropy-Based Weighted Objectives Function Method (EWOF) |> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |> No. X=(x1,x2) F(X)=(F1,F2) |> ------------------------------------------------------------------------------- |> 1 (165.29, 75.2) (0.2943695e+07, 0.49924662e-03) |> 2 (183.58, 74.609) (0.2961524e+07, 0.495371176e-03) |> 3 (192.75, 74.307) (0.2970895e+07, 0.493597705e-03) |> 4 (202.39, 73.986) (0.2981043e+07, 0.491856365e-03) |> 5 (212.51, 73.744) (0.2992045e+07, 0.490157399e-03) |> 6 (219.88, 73.392) (0.3000292e+07, 0.489001861e-03) |> 7 (223.67, 73.262) (0.3004618e+07, 0.488433288e-03) |> 8 (152.71, 40.0) (0.6162431e+07, 0.340317842e-03) |> 9 (145.21, 40.0) (0.6183632e+07, 0.340058003e-03) |> 10 (137.95, 40.0) (0.6204248e+07, 0.33983076e-03) |> 11 (132.72, 40.0) (0.6218924e+07, 0.33968105e-03) |> 12 (131.05, 40.0) (0.6223628e+07, 0.33963611e-03) |> 13 (124.50, 40.0) (0.624214 e+07, 0.339468941e-03) |> 14 (110.72, 40.0) (0.6281057e+07, 0.339171384e-03) |> 15 (101.02, 40.0) (0.6308531e+07, 0.339000951e-03) |> 16 (96.227, 40.0) (0.6321995e+07, 0.338929007e-03) |> 17 (74.569, 40.0) (0.6385737e+07, 0.33867266e-03) | Ooooohhhhh.... now that hits the spot! My life is now complete, I can die a happy man ;-) -- -Dean Johnson Software Berserker/Rabid-Prototyping Specialist Tools, Libraries, and Commands Group Cray Research Inc. Eagan, MN (612) 683-5880