Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!zephyr.ens.tek.com!tektronix!percy!littlei!intelhf!agora!nesbbx!billsey From: billsey@nesbbx.UUCP (Bill Seymour) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Subject: Re: The Amiga's Future Message-ID: <193f5229.ARN018e@nesbbx.UUCP> Date: 4 Jun 91 21:10:01 GMT References: <6678@vela.acs.oakland.edu> <1991Jun03.053144.3208@ariel.unm.edu> <5202@dirac.physics.purdue.edu> Reply-To: billsey@nesbbx.UUCP Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Organization: NES, Inc. Lines: 34 In article <5202@dirac.physics.purdue.edu>, William J. Murphy writes: > In article <1991Jun03.053144.3208@ariel.unm.edu> nwickham@triton.unm.edu (Neal C. Wickham) writes: > >I would give it a little more time. The Toaster just came out. 2.0 and > >the ECS is about to come out. And I'll bet it cost a lot of money to get > > I just don't get it. I remember a year ago or so when the A3000 came out. > Didn't it have both 2.0 and 1.3 ROMS? Although 2.0 ROMs weren't finalized, Actually, no. When the 3000 came out, and now, it had a set of special boot ROMs (or EPROMs) that loads a kickstart off of disk. Just like the 1000 does. The difference is, it loads that kickstart into system memory, then uses the MMU to map it to a ROM location. That means you use up some of your system memory whenever you're running. (256K for 1.3, 512K for 2.0) That will go away with the release of real 2.0 ROMs, freeing up the 512K for applications to use. > Why has it taken C= a year to produce those chips for retrofit into A2000s and > A500s? Will the entire ECS be available for Bill Murphy > murphy@physics.purdue.edu > > West Lafayette, IN: Where progress takes a back seat to tradition. -Bill Seymour nesbbx!billsey@agora.uucp or nesbbx!billsey@agora.rain.com ***** American People/Link Amiga Zone Hardware Specialist NES*BILL ***** Bejed, Inc. NES, Inc. NAG BBS NES BBX BBS Home Sometimes (503)281-8153 (503)246-9311 (503)656-7393 (503)640-9337 (503) 640-0842