Xref: utzoo comp.sys.amiga.datacomm:1289 comp.sys.amiga.misc:4105 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!mintaka!bloom-beacon!eru!hagbard!sunic!sics.se!fuug!funic!nntp.hut.fi!nntp-test.hut.fi!jtp From: jtp@niksula.hut.fi (Jukka Partanen) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.datacomm,comp.sys.amiga.misc Subject: Re: DNET Message-ID: Date: 31 May 91 14:27:11 GMT References: <1991May15.173938.25256@cadence.com> <192909c8.ARN00e8@nesbbx.UUCP> <1991May19.235912.16324@maverick.ksu.ksu.edu> <1991May30.125901.392@ulkyvx.bitnet> Sender: usenet@nntp.hut.fi (Usenet pseudouser id) Organization: Helsinki Univ. of Tech., Finland Lines: 18 In-Reply-To: jcjust01@ulkyvx.bitnet's message of 30 May 91 16:59:01 GMT Nntp-Posting-Host: zelda.hut.fi In article <1991May30.125901.392@ulkyvx.bitnet> jcjust01@ulkyvx.bitnet (J. Crazyrat Justen) writes: >> In article , Tad Guy writes: >>> dnet-2.20 (available via anonymous ftp from ftp.uu.net in > >How do you figure that this is version 2.20? When I got it (yesterday) the >README file told me that it was still 2.10. Needless to say I was very >disappointed. After using 2.00 for the past 1.5 years (and having it work >quite well), I was ready for an upgrade. The sources are new (fterm.c etc) but the binaries aren't. I had to recompile everything (and fix some bugs) before I got it to work. I also fixed snfs.c (Unix side). Doesn't Matt compile and test his stuff? -- When the going gets rough, more formalism is required - David Gries