Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!uakari.primate.wisc.edu!caen!hellgate.utah.edu!dog.ee.lbl.gov!nosc!crash!pnet01!pro-party.cts.com!seanc From: seanc@pro-party.cts.com (Sean Cunningham) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.graphics Subject: Re: Wayne's World (was: JMan Review: RENDER & Conclusion) Message-ID: <1991Jun1.011612.5678@crash.cts.com> Date: 1 Jun 91 01:16:12 GMT Sender: root@crash.cts.com Organization: Crash TimeSharing, El Cajon, CA Lines: 80 In-Reply-To: message from billc@cryo.UUCP billc@cryo.UUCP (William J. Coldwell) writes: >> Clearly you haven't experience in buying or selling high-end software. > >Why no Wayne, I wouldn't have ANY experience in that area. (sarcasm alert >- run for cover (or at least .advocacy!)) > >> Many of the best packages available are not sold via dealers. > >Depends on your dealers and your package. There are some very excellent >Amiga packages out there that are handled by educated and experienced >dealers. This is also implying that your package is "best". ...gee, you think maybe he was talking about professional packages OUTSIDE the Amiga market??? Can you walk into a storefront someplace and say, "I'd like a copy of Wavefront Visualizer...and a copy of SGI World, to go."??? I think not... (more gripes deleted) >Yeh, you probably spend at most $40 on the whole package. The main cost is >feeding your developers (and we haven't heard too much from Ken lately - did > >he die from starvation? ;-)) The whole 3DPro1.0 package cost ~$40, and I >can't fathom that your packaging is more extensive. I'm pretty sure Ken's hard at work making JMan even better...not wasting his time slinging mud at a competitor. Packaging? What's the point of having really cool packaging if the product is crap. I used 3DPro1.0 as soon as it came out. Yeah, the packaging was great...hell, it looked like a Mac application. But aside from a fairly nice marble texture, that can't be animated (Jesus!), I had no use for it. I hate interfaces that won't let you turn on interlacing. And for a Phong shader, it sure did act like it was a raytracer. When rendering with JMan and its relatively slow renders, I half understand because it's a raytracer. But having relatively simple scenes take more than an hour with just Phong shading and your fake antialiacing (which just made the image blurry) is out of the question. I also don't like the upper limit of 1024x1024. Some of these issues may have been addressed with later versions. But my first impression keeps me from even considering the package. (more crap deleted) >You are still expecting people to plop down $500 "sight-unseen". Dealers >give you that extra sales staff (when they are educated in your product). You overestimate dealers. Aside from one or two dealerships that I've been to (Amazing in San Antonio), most dealers don't know jack about what they're selling. I used to work at a dealership...and without going into details, let me just say that I still get calls FROM THEM about applications that they're trying to sell, but don't know the first thing about. Most computer retailers are just a rung above used car dealers on the ladder of evolution. (and even more stuff deleted) Let me end this message just by saying I find it distasteful for a developer to criticize his competition's product in a public forum. There is nothing to be gained by spouting your oppinions on Hash's product. Bottom line is, Hash Enterprises decides how they'll sell their product, not Cryogenic Software, who has this decided for them by Progressive Peripherals & Software. Sean /\ RealWorld: Sean Cunningham / \ "Doing our business is what INET: seanc@pro-party.cts.com VISION Amigas are for." Voice: (512) 992-2810 \ / // \/ "Holy #@*!" - any Psygnosis KEEP THE COMPETITION UNDER \X/ GRAPHICS game player