Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!kali.enet.dec.com!plouff
From: plouff@kali.enet.dec.com (Wes Plouff)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Information on Amiga Technical Reference Seri
Message-ID: <23099@shlump.lkg.dec.com>
Date: 2 Jun 91 03:03:54 GMT
Sender: newsdaemon@shlump.lkg.dec.com
Organization: Digital Equipment Corporation
Lines: 14


In article <1991Jun2.121530.942@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>, chem194@csc.canterbury.ac.nz (John Davis) writes...
>In article <1603@glyph.kingston.ny.us>, ahh@glyph.kingston.ny.us (Andy Heffernan) writes:
>> In article <21956@cbmvax.commodore.com> ken@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ken Farinsky - CATS) writes:
>>>In article <1601@glyph.kingston.ny.us> ahh@glyph.UUCP (Andy Heffernan) writes:
>>>>In article <22877@shlump.lkg.dec.com> plouff@kali.enet.dec.com (Wes Plouff) writes:
>> [...]
Whoa!  Too many levels of references here.  I was the original poster of
this thread, but readers may recall that the only opinion offered there
was regarding the timeliness of technical publishers.  Leave me out of
this heavier paper debate, please!

-- 
Wes Plouff	plouff@kali.enet.dec.com