Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!glyph!ahh
From: ahh@glyph.kingston.ny.us (Andy Heffernan)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer
Subject: Re: Information on Amiga Technical Reference Seri
Message-ID: <1605@glyph.kingston.ny.us>
Date: 4 Jun 91 02:23:15 GMT
References: <23099@shlump.lkg.dec.com>
Reply-To: ahh@glyph.UUCP (Andy Heffernan)
Organization: Moji Computing
Lines: 20

In article <23099@shlump.lkg.dec.com> plouff@kali.enet.dec.com (Wes Plouff) writes:
->
->In article <1991Jun2.121530.942@csc.canterbury.ac.nz>, chem194@csc.canterbury.ac.nz (John Davis) writes...
->>In article <1603@glyph.kingston.ny.us>, ahh@glyph.kingston.ny.us (Andy Heffernan) writes:
->>> In article <21956@cbmvax.commodore.com> ken@cbmvax.commodore.com (Ken Farinsky - CATS) writes:
->>>>In article <1601@glyph.kingston.ny.us> ahh@glyph.UUCP (Andy Heffernan) writes:
->>>>>In article <22877@shlump.lkg.dec.com> plouff@kali.enet.dec.com (Wes Plouff) writes:
->>> [...]
->Whoa!  Too many levels of references here.  I was the original poster of
->this thread, but readers may recall that the only opinion offered there
->was regarding the timeliness of technical publishers.  Leave me out of
->this heavier paper debate, please!

It is too late.  We have you in our clutches.

Mwaa ha haaa.

-- 
-------------------------------------------------------------------------
  Andy Heffernan		文字		uunet!glyph!ahh