Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!pacbell.com!decwrl!deccrl!news.crl.dec.com!nntpd.lkg.dec.com!ryn.mro4.dec.com!ultnix.enet.dec.com!taber From: taber@ultnix.enet.dec.com (Patrick St. Joseph Teahan Taber) Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds Subject: Re: Split of comp.sys.handhelds: straw poll results Message-ID: <5069@ryn.mro4.dec.com> Date: 31 May 91 12:16:04 GMT References: <5027@ryn.mro4.dec.com> <5040@ryn.mro4.dec.com> <1991May30.201733.3757@eecs.nwu.edu> Sender: guest@ryn.mro4.dec.com Reply-To: taber@ultnix.enet.dec.com (Patrick St. Joseph Teahan Taber) Distribution: comp Organization: KC1TD@KB4N.NH.USA.NA.EARTH.SOLAR_SYSTEM.UNIVERSE.MIND_OF_GOD.01463 Lines: 41 In article <1991May30.201733.3757@eecs.nwu.edu>, kaufman@eecs.nwu.edu (Michael |>In article <5040@ryn.mro4.dec.com> taber@ultnix.enet.dec.com (Patrick St. Joseph Teahan Taber) writes: |>>So we're back to not knowing if there is consensus around the |>.palmtops |>>proposal. |> |>There you go again, trying to pour gasoline on the fire. Since 18 |>people voted |>(informally) for the .hp48 proposal, you may sleep in confort with the |>knowledge |>that there is no .palmtops consensus. |> |>Or if this is not good enough for you, I formally (again) state that I |>do not |>support the .palmtops idea. There are just not enough messages/week |>to |>justify it. |> Silly me. I guess I should have asked you in the first place. What was I thinking of? |>>I give up. I formally withdraw all opposition to anything. Let's just |>>do the vote. |>> |>Does this mean that you will vote for the .hp48 proposal? Or at least not |>vote against it? No. It means have your vote. Do whatever you want. I will vote my opinion if I vote at all. But it doesn't matter. Regardless of the outcome I can find the part that I'm interested in and to hell with the rest of it. -- >>>==>PStJTT Patrick St. Joseph Teahan Taber, KC1TD Give a man a solution and you're employed for life. Teach a man to find solutions and you're employed for a day.