Xref: utzoo comp.sys.handhelds:8221 news.groups:32541 Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!nstn.ns.ca!news.cs.indiana.edu!spool.mu.edu!agate!agate.berkeley.edu!matt From: matt@physics16.berkeley.edu (Matt Austern) Newsgroups: comp.sys.handhelds,news.groups Subject: Re: Split of comp.sys.handhelds Message-ID: Date: 31 May 91 23:01:47 GMT References: <5040@ryn.mro4.dec.com> <1991May30.201733.3757@eecs.nwu.edu> <5069@ryn.mro4.dec.com> <1991May31.214700.24851@leland.Stanford.EDU> Sender: root@agate.berkeley.edu (Charlie Root) Reply-To: matt@physics.berkeley.edu Distribution: comp Organization: Lawrence Berkeley Laboratory (Theoretical Physics Group) Lines: 16 In-Reply-To: mcgrant@elaine10.Stanford.EDU's message of 31 May 91 21: 47:00 GMT In article <1991May31.214700.24851@leland.Stanford.EDU> mcgrant@elaine10.Stanford.EDU (Michael Grant) writes: > Now if we can just convince everyone who hates the .hp48 proposal > of this, as well as everyone who hates the .palmtops proposal, then > we can save a hell of a lot of argument and get this discussion over > with. There's enough screaming to justify two groups, that's clear. Or possibly three groups. I no longer believe that it would be stupid to create comp.sys.palmtops, comp.sys.calculators, *and* comp.sys.calculators.hp48. At any rate, I now believe that all three groups should be voted on. -- Matthew Austern Just keep yelling until you attract a (415) 644-2618 crowd, then a constituency, a movement, a austern@lbl.bitnet faction, an army! If you don't have any matt@physics.berkeley.edu solutions, become a part of the problem!