Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!ut-emx!chaos.utexas.edu!solomon From: solomon@chaos.utexas.edu (Thomas Solomon) Newsgroups: comp.sys.ibm.pc.hardware Subject: Re: EISA -- Is it worth it? Keywords: EISA 486 ISA Message-ID: <49793@ut-emx.uucp> Date: 1 Jun 91 00:25:50 GMT References: Sender: news@ut-emx.uucp Reply-To: solomon@chaos.utexas.edu (Thomas Solomon) Distribution: usa Organization: University of Texas at Austin, Center for Nonlinear Dynamics Lines: 38 In article gurganus@palomino.ecn.purdue.edu (James P Gurganus) writes: > >everything for right around $4000. After calling 40 dealers or so, I've found >that the majority of them think that EISA isn't worth it since little or >nothing is available for it and that nobody will create any hardware for it >as long as I live, etc., etc. Then I read popular magazine articles saying >"unleash the power of your 486 with EISA." I'm slightly confused. This business about nothing being available and "that nobody will create any hardware for it as long as [we] live" is just not true. Our lab is planning on buying an EISA machine for data taking and analysis. The machine that we are buying will have an EISA disk controller (worth the value of the EISA bus alone) and an image processing system that uses the EISA interface for 32-bit data transfers. In addition, there are EISA ethernet cards currently available, along with data acquisition hardware (from National Instruments) that takes advantage of the EISA to get higher throughput. These are all things that are available _now_. UNDOUBTABLY, companies will make more EISA products in the future, once enough EISA machines are out there and once people start realizing the full potential of EISA. With 32 bits versus 16, and 33 MHz capabilities versus 8 MHz, an EISA system can transfer data to or from peripherals up to 8 times faster than ISA. I think that it is inconceivable that (in this highly competitive computer market) companies will not try to take advantage of that power. Granted, our applications require more bus power than many applications, since we are interfacing our computer to experiments. But I am still of the opinion that it is worth a few extra hundred dollars to buy a system that will be able to keep up with the times. So if you think that you may need to do some interfacing, or if you might need a super- fast disk controller in the future, then go with the EISA. On the other hand, if you are planning on using your machine for word processing, data base stuff, spreadsheets or the kind of stuff that most businesses buy PCs for (i.e., tasks in which the computer need not communicate very much with peripherals), then you will never need the EISA power. Tom Solomon solomon@chaos.utexas.edu