Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!swrinde!mips!pacbell.com!att!att!cbnewsl!conty
From: conty@cbnewsl.att.com (The Conty)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.games
Subject: Re: Comments on Your Spaceward Ho 2.0 Comments
Message-ID: <1991May31.210927.22043@cbnewsl.att.com>
Date: 31 May 91 21:09:27 GMT
References: <1991May31.185541.9033@neon.Stanford.EDU>
Organization: The Event Horizon
Lines: 14

In article <1991May31.185541.9033@neon.Stanford.EDU>, commons@Sunburn.Stanford.EDU (Peter Commons) writes:
> 
> 3) I kind of like the elegance of the fact that Spaceward Ho! is not so
>    complex that it takes three weeks just to learn how to play it. If I added
>    every feature people suggested (eg. doubling the number of techs, etc.), it
>    might lose a bit of that charm. Thoughts?

Agreed.  I'll choose good gameplay over "detail" and "realism" any day.
I'd still like to have a "retreat" option, tho.  :-)

-- 
			    E n r i q u e  C o n t y
			  The Amazing Man-With-No-Life
			      jester@ihlpl.att.com