Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!stanford.edu!neon.Stanford.EDU!kaufman
From: kaufman@neon.Stanford.EDU (Marc T. Kaufman)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.programmer
Subject: Re: 68000 Assembly question -- overflow
Message-ID: <1991May31.054322.7297@neon.Stanford.EDU>
Date: 31 May 91 05:43:22 GMT
References: <1991May30.020707.11193@neon.Stanford.EDU> <1991May30.161303.1930@umbc3.umbc.edu> <13745@dog.ee.lbl.gov>
Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Ca , USA
Lines: 17

In article <13745@dog.ee.lbl.gov> osborn@ux1.lbl.gov (James R Osborn) writes:
>Hey guys,

>Don't you think this "68000 Assembly question" has gotten out
>of the spirit of "comp.sys.mac.programmer"?  I don't give a
>flying hoot about whether the mac uses 1's complement or 2's
>complement, and I never will!  8^( Perhaps you'd care to move
>your discussion elsewhere.)

Gee, and all this time I thought that this group was about PROGRAMMING the
Mac.  Last I looked, one needed at least a rudimentary knowledge of how
data is represented at the bit level.

But maybe you are using a high level language, so you don't need to know
that kind of stuff.

Marc Kaufman (kaufman@Neon.stanford.edu)