Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!mips!ptimtc!rdmei!icspub!youki From: youki@neptune.ics.osaka-u.ac.jp (Youki Kadobayashi) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: UI idea...comments, anyone? Message-ID: Date: 3 Jun 91 06:30:54 GMT References: <1991Jun2.203311.19795@fcom.cc.utah.edu> Sender: news@icspub.ics.osaka-u.ac.jp Organization: Dept. of Info. and Comp. Sci., Osaka Univ., Japan Lines: 36 In article <1991Jun2.203311.19795@fcom.cc.utah.edu> burchard@math.utah.edu (Paul Burchard) writes: >From: burchard@math.utah.edu (Paul Burchard) >Newsgroups: comp.sys.next >Keywords: drag-and-drop, tools, documents vs. applications >Date: 2 Jun 91 20:33:11 GMT >Sender: news@fcom.cc.utah.edu >Organization: University of Utah Computer Center >Lines: 93 > >I think NeXT has done a great job of putting a User Interface on UNIX. As has >been discussed here, though, there's still one significant gap to filled: in >the UI it's hard to work on Documents using different tools---especially UNIX >tools. This gap probably arose from the current Application-oriented (rather >than Document-oriented) slant of NeXTstep. > >I think it's possible create this ``multiple tool'' functionality with a >minimum of disruption to NeXTstep, by basing it on the drag-and-drop mechanism >which already exists in the Workspace. Just as folder icons can now accept >file icons, icons of executables and Applications would then be able to accept >Document icons. > Try "SystemWorks". It's simple and programmable NeXTstep-to-UNIX interface. I just put the latest version (1.1 beta) on cs.orst.edu:~ftp/pub/next/submissions. Recompilation is needed to run SystemWorks on 2.[01]. It contains 2.0J-compiled binary. Let me hear your comments, NeXTlanders. Enjoy. -- Youki Kadobayashi Information Network Architecture Lab. Dept. of Info. and Comp. Sci, Osaka University, Japan