Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!garnett From: garnett@cs.utexas.edu (John William Garnett) Newsgroups: comp.sys.next Subject: Re: Shouldn't 70 ns SIMMs work with '040?? (they don't for me, anyway) Message-ID: <1517@dimebox.cs.utexas.edu> Date: 5 Jun 91 15:30:15 GMT References: <1429@actisb.UUCP> Organization: University of Texas at Austin Lines: 33 In article cnh5730@maraba.tamu.edu (Charles Herrick) writes: >In article <1429@actisb.UUCP> federico@actisb.UUCP (Federico Heinz) writes: > The SIMMs that don't work are 1MBx9, 70 ns, and I'm attempting to use > them together wih the original 1MBx8 SIMMs that came with the Cube. > I'm puzzled. > >You can not mix (1X9) SIMMS with (1X8) SIMMS on a NeXT, even if >parity-checking is disabled. Replace your 70ns (1X9) with 70ns (1X8) >and try again. > >Pascal, could this go into the FAQ, please? > >-- Chuck Please double check that. From the FAQ: ]I2. What type of memory may be installed in a NeXT? ] ] and the hard drive in simultaneously. Note that parity (9-bit) ] RAMS can be used in both the 030 NeXT and the 040 NeXT. Parity ] and non-parity SIMMS can be mixed in both the 030 and the 040 ] (however, the boot on 040 boxes will generate a warning). Only ] the 040 NeXT can use the parity memory to detect parity errors ] (parity and non-parity may not be mixed if you wish to have ] parity errors detected). 2.2 (v63) ROM lets you disable parity ] checking (NVRAM preference). 2.1 (v59) does not. -- John Garnett University of Texas at Austin garnett@cs.utexas.edu Department of Computer Science Austin, Texas