Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!ncar!ames!ads.com!potomac.ads.com!jclose
From: jclose@potomac.ads.com (Jeff Close)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sgi
Subject: Re: What's better about SG machines than SPARCS?
Keywords: usenet news, rn, nn
Message-ID: <1991Jun3.183735.7157@potomac.ads.com>
Date: 3 Jun 91 18:37:35 GMT
References: <1991May17.135754@crocus.medicine.rochester.edu> <sth.674517317@slipknot> <1991Jun3.154348.4251@potomac.ads.com>
Distribution: na
Organization: Advanced Decision Systems, Arlington, VA
Lines: 11


I want to thank those who responded to my earlier posting regarding performance
of SG vs. SPARC.  I did get a few numbers that may help, but it seems a
pretty futile exercise -- anyone who needs the argument isn't going to get it
anyway.  Thanks again..

-- 
---------------------------------v------------------------------------
InterNet: jclose@ads.com         | VoiceNet: 703-243-1611
ADS, 1500 Wilson Blvd #512       | "Now it's time for something you'll
Arlington, VA 22209              | REALLY like.." - Rocky the Squirrel