Path: utzoo!utgpu!cunews!bnrgate!brchh104!brchs1!bnr.ca!rice.edu!sun-spots-request
From: infmx!jms@uunet.uu.net (John Stephens)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.sun
Subject: performance NeWS vs. X11R4
Keywords: No Digest Subjects in Unmoderated Mode
Message-ID: <3115@brchh104.bnr.ca>
Date: 4 Jun 91 18:40:00 GMT
Sender: news@brchh104.bnr.ca
Organization: Sunspots, Psuedo-Unmoderated
Lines: 26
Approved: sun-spots@rice.edu
X-Original-Date:    Fri, 10 May 91 23:29:55 GMT

A number of our users have been complaining of declining performance
of there 12 MB 4.1.1 SparcStations while running openlook. Looking
at comparative perfmeters versus my machine with a generic R4
installation and mwm1.1, I can see very little difference *except*

on the openlook machines, it appears that the xnews process is 
taking up an inordinate amount of the ram/cpu. From a typical ps
(edited to fit the page):

%CPU %MEM   SZ  RSS START  TIME COMMAND
 0.0 25.3 3184 2716 16:38 264:01 xnews :0 -auth $HOME/.xnews.$HOST:0
 0.0  0.0   40    0 16:38   0:00 xinit - - xnews :0 -auth /net/grizzly/tool2

This is after the machine has been up just under 24 hours. Why is xnews
soaking up 250+ cpu minutes (more than 10 minutes per hour !) and 25%
of the ram ?!!!

Thanks for shedding light on the darkness,

Jack
-- 
 -------------------------------------------------------------------------
| Jack Stephens      ..!{uunet|pyramid}!infmx!jms --or-- ..!jack!wzlr!jms |
| Systems Programmer "Into the valley of Death rode the 600...            |
| Informix Software      which allowed them to use the carpool lane."     |