Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!think.com!paperboy!hsdndev!dartvax!eleazar.dartmouth.edu!paw
From: paw@eleazar.dartmouth.edu (Pat Wilson)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.aix
Subject: Re: network and 3005
Keywords: network, 3005
Message-ID: <1991Jun5.131358.18905@dartvax.dartmouth.edu>
Date: 5 Jun 91 13:13:58 GMT
References: <1991Jun2.053220.12638@cmcl2.nyu.edu> <30500@hydra.gatech.EDU> <1991Jun04.043228.7824@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu>
Sender: news@dartvax.dartmouth.edu (The News Manager)
Organization: Dartmouth College, Hanover, NH
Lines: 26

dbeedle@rs6000.cmp.ilstu.edu (Dave Beedle) writes:

>>>Recently I have the 3005 upgrade installed(RS6000/320). Since then I got
>>>a lot of trouble with the ethernet. The network crashes 
>>>frequently(about twice a day, unable to rlogin, telnet, etc), 

>>Sounds familiar.  Do the folks in Austin have any comments?  
>>Systems affected are 320 with 16mb/320mb, and 520 with 16mb/600mb.
>>My 530 (64mb/2.5gb) doesn't seem to be affected... is this a hint?

>     Add a model 530 with 16meg to the list.  I post about this (or
>something very similar) a couple of weeks ago.  I did talk with software
>support but they were unable to help.  They did suggest having our CE check
>trace data from the network card (token ring in our case) but I never got
>around to calling.  

Odd.  Just thought I'd add (to the confusion of all) that I've seen 
no such problems while upgrading _my_ 3005 systems (320 16/320s, with
either thick or thin ethernet).  I was coming from 3003 - I wonder if that
made a difference?


-- 
Pat Wilson
Systems Manager, Project NORTHSTAR
paw@northstar.dartmouth.edu