Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!ns-mx!ccad.uiowa.edu!cadsi
From: cadsi@ccad.uiowa.edu (CADSI)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: I hate WinQVT, but I still can't find anything better.
Message-ID: <1991May31.205827.15299@ccad.uiowa.edu>
Date: 31 May 91 20:58:27 GMT
References: <24425107@bfmny0.BFM.COM>
Organization: CAD-Research, U. of Iowa, Iowa City, Iowa
Lines: 20

From article <24425107@bfmny0.BFM.COM>, by tneff@bfmny0.BFM.COM (Tom Neff):
> In article <91151.001743DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu> DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu (David Barr) writes:
>>WinQVT is a usable package.  In fact sorry to say it is the best package
>>I know, but I refuse to register for a package that has this many bugs,
>                ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
>>and seems very unresponsive to customer complaints.
>                                 ^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^^
> 
> How do you know they're unresponsive to customer complaints?  If you
> refuse to register, you're not a customer.

In business, customers generally include prospective customers.  The
prospects are EVERY bit as important as the licensed.  I hope ALL
software developers share this belief.

|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|
|Tom Hite					|  The views expressed by me |
|Manager, Product development			|  are mine, not necessarily |
|CADSI (Computer Aided Design Software Inc.	|  the views of CADSI.       |
|----------------------------------------------------------------------------|