Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!cis.ohio-state.edu!ucbvax!ucdavis!csusac!usenet
From: chenh@athena.ecs.csus.edu ( h philip chen )
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: I hate WinQVT, but I still can't find anything better.
Message-ID: <1991Jun1.184145.8392@csusac.csus.edu>
Date: 1 Jun 91 18:41:45 GMT
References: <91151.001743DSB100@psuvm.psu.edu> <1991May31.205513.13322@ccad.uiowa.edu> <b5ph6j@rpi.edu>
Sender: usenet@csusac.csus.edu (News account (alt))
Organization: California State University, Sacramento
Lines: 22

quimby@mts.rpi.edu writes:
>But wait, there's more:
>  
>9)  The reliability of kermit transfers is something like 40% with
>large files.  MSKermit, even on a slow machine, is much more reliable
>as a DOS background task. 
>  
>10) The scrollback buffer is only about two pages, which is quite
>a bit smaller than the Windows Terminal program.  


here, one more!

11)  The ``Log File'' functions doesn't work.  I've tried it on 3 separate
     occassions, and all I found in the saved-files were a bunch of nonsense.
     (Either that, or I better sign up for some data encryption/decryption 
     classes:-))


-philip chenh@athena.ecs.csus.edu

PS.  On the good side, their README.WRI file is less ambiguous now.