Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!sdd.hp.com!wuarchive!udel!rochester!kodak!ispd-newsserver!ism.isc.com!b1!ico!auto-trol!marbru From: marbru@auto-trol.com (Martin Brunecky) Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif Subject: Re: UIL vs. C code Keywords: UIL motif C Message-ID: <1991May31.165653.23064@auto-trol.com> Date: 31 May 91 16:56:53 GMT References: <1991May30.160724.12989@infonode.ingr.com> Sender: news@auto-trol.com Organization: Auto-trol Technology Corporation Lines: 38 Nntp-Posting-Host: server_1-gw In article <1991May30.160724.12989@infonode.ingr.com> doyle@doyled.b23b.ingr.com writes: >I am interested in obtaining some objective data about the performance >of Motif 1.1.* UIL (uid) relative to equivalent functionality >implemented in C. > >Some of the things that I want to know is: > 1) what kind of startup (load) impact is there > (Does XtCreateWidget() overhead outweight disk/UIL overhead?) Mrm calls XtCreate widget so everything UIL does is an add-on. > 2) what are some limitations with using UIL > ex: limited data in callbacks and event handlers (no comments, I hate it) > 3) internationalization issues UIL compiler gives you some ways to encode non-ISO-LATIN text If you have the source, you can put this code into your app. > 4) are there techniques that make some UIL file better than others > 5) can I use my own widgets with UIL They say yes. You just have to change compiler tables and rebuild the compiler. If you want to add new data types ..... > 6) use with respect to "form" builders > 7) anything else that's important Look at Wcl (look at FAQ list for more). Using UIL is BAD, the only thing even worse is doing it in "C".... > -- =*= Opinions presented here are solely of my own and not those of Auto-trol =*= Martin Brunecky marbru%auto-trol@sunpeaks.central.sun.com (303) 252-2499 (better avoid: marbru@auto-trol.COM ) Auto-trol Technology Corp. 12500 North Washington St., Denver, CO 80241-2404