Newsgroups: comp.windows.x.motif
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!convex!connolly
From: connolly@convex.com (Dan Connolly)
Subject: Re: UIL vs. C code
Message-ID: <connolly.675977637@convex.convex.com>
Keywords: UIL motif C
Sender: usenet@convex.com (news access account)
Nntp-Posting-Host: pixel.convex.com
Organization: CONVEX Computer Corporation, Richardson, Tx., USA
References: <1991May30.160724.12989@infonode.ingr.com> <1991May31.165653.23064@auto-trol.com>
Date: Mon, 3 Jun 1991 19:33:57 GMT
Lines: 18

In <1991May31.165653.23064@auto-trol.com> marbru@auto-trol.com (Martin Brunecky) writes:

>In article <1991May30.160724.12989@infonode.ingr.com> doyle@doyled.b23b.ingr.com writes:
>>I am interested in obtaining some objective data about the performance
>>of Motif 1.1.* UIL (uid) relative to equivalent functionality 
>>implemented in C.
>>
>>    7) anything else that's important
>        Look at Wcl (look at FAQ list for more).
>        Using UIL is BAD, the only thing even worse is doing it in "C"....

I'd like to second this piece of advice. These interface languages are
all about increasing productivity, no? Wcl does. UIL doesn't. That's all
I've got to say.

Dan