Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!cs.utexas.edu!uwm.edu!csd4.csd.uwm.edu!info-high-audio-request
From: lrb@alex.ctrg.rri.uwo.ca (3787 x4108)
Newsgroups: rec.audio.high-end
Subject: logan CLS versus sequel
Message-ID: <12782@uwm.edu>
Date: 5 Jun 91 12:53:50 GMT
Sender: news@uwm.edu
Lines: 12
Approved: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu
Originator: tjk@csd4.csd.uwm.edu


i've been very happy with the CLS's for the last few years, but hear
mostly on the net about people's sequels.

why are people seemingly prefering the sequels over the cls, or is it
that cls owners are just too busy listening....

-- 
Lance R. Bailey  Systems Manager        box: Robarts Research Institute
          email: lrb@rri.uwo.ca              Clinical Trials Resources Group
            fax: 519.663.3789                P.O. Box 5015, 100 Perth Dr.
            vox: 519.663.3787 ext. 4108      London, Canada N6A 5K8