Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!usc!ucla-cs!usenet
From: limonce@pilot.njin.net (Tom Limoncelli +1 201 408 5389)
Newsgroups: sci.med.aids
Subject: Re: Massage Oil & Safer Sex
Message-ID: <1991Jun3.050909.6380@cs.ucla.edu>
Date: 3 Jun 91 02:26:58 GMT
References: <1991May26.020015.11372@cs.ucla.edu> <1991May30.034217.27538@cs.ucla.edu> <1991Jun2.003233.18862@cs.ucla.edu>
Sender: usenet@cs.ucla.edu (Mr. News Himself)
Organization: Drew University - Madison NJ
Lines: 20
Approved: ddodell@stjhmc.fidonet.org (David Dodell)
Note: non-commercial reproduction.
Nntp-Posting-Host: squid.cs.ucla.edu
Archive-Number: 3221

In article <1991Jun2.003233.18862@cs.ucla.edu> rob@mtdiablo.Concord.CA.US (Rob Bernardo) writes:

> Gee, after being beaten to a dead horse state in motss recently,
> you'd think people (who read soc.motss) would get his right.

I'm from New Jersey, the only state that AIDS has never been a motss
disease.  That's besides the point, I don't read soc.motss becaue I
don't have the time. ;-)

> *Any* oil-based substance is bad for latex.  It doesn't have to
> be a petroleum derived oil to be bad for non-natural condoms.

Right.  As I said in my first post (the one that started all this):

       Are there any massage substances that are not oil based?

-Tom
-- 
Tom Limoncelli   tlimonce@drew.edu  tlimonce@drew.bitnet   201-408-5389
                  "People in tight pants, moving fast."