Xref: utzoo alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk:94 comp.admin.policy:348
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!rex!uflorida!mailer.cc.fsu.edu!fsu1.cc.fsu.edu!otto
From: otto@fsu1.cc.fsu.edu (John Otto)
Newsgroups: alt.comp.acad-freedom.talk,comp.admin.policy
Subject: Re: Ohio State University CIS Policies
Message-ID: <1991Jun8.030043.10579@mailer.cc.fsu.edu>
Date: 8 Jun 91 03:09:05 GMT
References: <1991Jun3.165946.12637@eff.org> <1991Jun3.173550.13928@eff.org> <AEJ.91Jun4090410@manyjars.WPI.EDU>
Sender: news@mailer.cc.fsu.edu (Usenet News File Owner)
Reply-To: otto@fsu1.cc.fsu.edu
Organization: Florida State University
Lines: 11
News-Software: VAX/VMS VNEWS 1.3-4
Nntp-Posting-Host: fsu1.cc.fsu.edu

In article <AEJ.91Jun4090410@manyjars.WPI.EDU>, aej@manyjars.WPI.EDU (Allan E Johannesen) writes...
>>>>>> On 4 Jun 91 00:40:16 GMT, kadie@eff.org (Carl Kadie) said:

>kadie> A student at Ohio State student tells me that users there are
>kadie> also locked out (denied access to their computer account) when
>kadie> they are wanted for a meeting. The difference is they are given
>kadie> no notice before the lock out.

>Golly.  There could be _no_ genuine reason for this, could there?

I agree.  There could be no genuine reason for this.