Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!samsung!nstar!larry
From: larry@nstar.rn.com (Larry Snyder)
Newsgroups: comp.dcom.modems
Subject: Re: Telebit and V.32bis
Message-ID: <1991Jun07.020706.16088@nstar.rn.com>
Date: 7 Jun 91 02:07:06 GMT
References: <1991Jun1.063101.3896@netcom.COM> <1991Jun02.231341.3315@nstar.rn.com> <98879@lll-winken.LLNL.GOV> <1991Jun6.193254.3886@robobar.co.uk>
Organization: NSTAR, Indiana's BBS 219-289-0287/317-251-7391
Lines: 20

ronald@robobar.co.uk (Ronald S H Khoo) writes:

>Well, if all your UUCP connections are like Larry's, that seems reasonable.

Larry (myself) operates a BBS supporting zmodem, ymodem, xmodem, sealink,
kermit and uucp --- not just UUCP.  v.32bis is a winner using every
protocol.  v.32bis also lowers the baud with noise, and raises it after
the line quality improves.

>also been anecdotal evidence from users that V.32 stinks where PEP
>worked fine(ish).

what about v.32bis?  v.32bis changed the baud depending on the
quality of the line.  

-- 
      Larry Snyder, NSTAR Public Access Unix 219-289-0287/317-251-7391
                         HST/PEP/V.32/v.32bis/v.42bis 
                        regional UUCP mapping coordinator 
               {larry@nstar.rn.com, ..!uunet!nstar.rn.com!larry}