Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!lll-winken!telecom-request From: IZZYAS1@mvs.oac.ucla.edu (Andy Jacobson) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Visit to California Message-ID: Date: 9 Jun 91 02:04:00 GMT Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Organization: TELECOM Digest Lines: 19 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 437, Message 4 of 8 Carl Moore (VLD/VMB) writes: > 213/310 -- prefix list provided for 213 with asterisk to show if a > prefix or range of prefixes is moving to 310. There is a 310 PREFIX > (huh?) listed for Santa Monica, which is moving to 310. The only > prefixes staying in 213 will be Los Angeles (including FX lines > serving places which are otherwise in 818 and in the future 310) and The 310 prefix is for GTE internal offices. No subscriber lines are on this prefix. Very few of these numbers are ever given out to the public. Several I know are translations of 800 numbers for various flavors of customer service. It will be curious to see if this prefix persists after the cutover to the new 310 area code. If it does, it may be unique in being the only prefix identical to its own area code. (No reason why not really). Andy Jacobson or