Path: utzoo!telecom-request Date: Fri, 07 Jun 91 11:11:33 PST From: Ken McVay Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: RBOC's Can Now Manufacture Equipment Reply-to: dleibold@attmail.com Message-ID: Organization: TELECOM Digest Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 440, Message 8 of 10 Lines: 38 From a story in the {Ft Lauderdale Sun-Sentinel}, based on wire services, the U.S. Senate had approved a bill that gives the RBOCs the right to manufacture telephone equipment in competition with AT&T. This bill passed 71-24 although there was concern of a presidential veto due to provisions preventing the RBOCs from running foreign manufacturing operations. In other words, the bill has a "buy American" slant to it, to maintain domestic manufacturing. All products made by the RBOC's must contain at least 60% domestic parts, and their equipment would have to be made available for purchase by independent telcos. Furthermore, a new bill could let the telcos compete directly with cable companies, while setting forth a goal of a nationwide fibre optic network by 2015 (presumably this means local fibre access; long distance fibre should mostly be in place by the major carriers). Sen. Albert Gore supported the cable bill, stating high rates and poor service of cable companies while claiming that competition could reduce cable TV rates by half. A separate bill sponsored by Gore would bring back federal regulation of cable TV while preventing telcos from buying existing cable systems within their territory. To compare cable TV rates and illustrate the cost situation, Rogers Cable in Toronto charged CAD$18.56 per month, including tax (or about USD$16.90, depending on exchange rates). Com-Cast out of West Palm Beach, FL charges well into the USD$20's/month and has plenty of local advertising superimposed on its offerings (like CNN). Meanwhile, there are tales of vastly reduced rates in those U.S. jurisdictions that have allowed a competing cable company to start up business. David Leibold dleibold@attmail.com Dave Leibold - via IMEx node 89:681/1 Dave.Leibold@f135.n82.z89.onebdos.UUCP Uucp - via IMEx node 89:681/1 Uucp@onebdos.oneb.wimsey.bc.ca Ken McVay - via IMEx node 89:681/1 Ken.McVay@onebdos.oneb.wimsey.bc.ca