Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!spool.mu.edu!agate!telecom-request From: john@zygot.ati.com (John Higdon) Newsgroups: comp.dcom.telecom Subject: Re: Surprise!! Message-ID: Date: 9 Jun 91 21:06:00 GMT Sender: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu Reply-To: John Higdon Organization: Green Hills and Cows Lines: 18 Approved: Telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Submissions-To: telecom@eecs.nwu.edu X-Administrivia-To: telecom-request@eecs.nwu.edu X-Telecom-Digest: Volume 11, Issue 444, Message 5 of 10 On Jun 6 at 1:59, I wrote: > Given that we are just about out of area codes, this would be a very > bad idea (tm). In California alone no less than five new area codes > would be required to fulfill your reform proposal. And then I gave a list of LATAs that shared area codes. Sufficient mail has come my way to indicate that I was not clear enough that I was naming LATAs, not cities. (Yes, I know that San Francisco, the city, does not share 408 with Monterey. But the San Francisco LATA shares 408 with the Monterey LATA.) Once again, I assumed too much. John Higdon | P. O. Box 7648 | +1 408 723 1395 john@zygot.ati.com | San Jose, CA 95150 | M o o !