Xref: utzoo comp.databases:10456 comp.edu:4424 comp.infosystems:265
Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!mips!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sol.ctr.columbia.edu!bronze!copper!olshause
From: olshause@copper.ucs.indiana.edu (Ronald Olshausen)
Newsgroups: comp.databases,comp.edu,comp.infosystems
Subject: ACCELL/SQL vs. PROGRESS
Summary: questions over product choice
Message-ID: <1991Jun8.011834.1049@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu>
Date: 8 Jun 91 01:18:34 GMT
Sender: news@bronze.ucs.indiana.edu (USENET News System)
Organization: Indiana University, Bloomington
Lines: 14

I'm doing a project which requires use of a 4GL on top of
an SQL-based RDBMS. 

Anyone out there with any experience with either ACCELL/SQL and/or
PROGRESS? Any comparisons between the two?

Any info at all would be much appreciated: cost, performance, etc.
Also, I'd be interested to hear whether one has any specific features
lacking in the other. Other similar packages would also be of interest.

Thanks in advance,

Ronald Olshausen
Indiana University - Bloomington