Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!sdd.hp.com!mips!pacbell.com!pacbell!well!nagle
From: nagle@well.sf.ca.us (John Nagle)
Newsgroups: comp.lang.c++
Subject: Re: solution to implementing parameterized classes
Message-ID: <25349@well.sf.ca.us>
Date: 10 Jun 91 17:54:27 GMT
References: <2792@umriscc.isc.umr.edu> <1991Jun9.013306.4462@cs.sfu.ca> <1991Jun9.204515.18040@ms.uky.edu>
Lines: 10


     The notion that the solution to providing generics in C++ involves a
template preprocessor feeding a C++ preprocessor feeding a C preprocessor
feeding a C compiler leads me to suspect that something is very wrong.

     As does the notion that "(void *)" should be a normal part of programming.

					John Nagle