Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!swrinde!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!rphroy!teemc!ka3ovk!barn!hoptoad!fidogate!f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG!tom.jennings
From: tom.jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG (tom jennings)
Newsgroups: comp.org.eff.talk
Subject: safeguarding electronic media
Message-ID: <14887.284ECCC1@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG>
Date: 6 Jun 91 08:41:55 GMT
Sender: ufgate@fidogate.FIDONET.ORG (newsout1.26)
Organization: FidoNet node 1:125/111 - Fido Software, San Francisco CA
Lines: 20

> >As the PHREAK trials have shown there is a difference 
> between printed media
> >and electronic media. Though one can also look up some 
 
The feds claimed that PHRACK wasnt protected by the 1st amendment? 
While I agree with the obvious that it should be, let's not get so 
wrapped up in our techie toys that we overlook the obvious --
 
Simply publish a PRINT publication, which happens to have electronic 
copies too. Just to demonstrate, the next FidoNews (which Iv'e just 
re-taken over editorship) will be offered on paper for $5.00 each, with 
electronic copies, free. I really will print 'em too ...
 
Voila! Protected! (A short-term solution.)


--  
tom jennings - via FidoNet node 1:125/777
    UUCP: ...!uunet!hoptoad!fidogate!111!tom.jennings
INTERNET: tom.jennings@f111.n125.z1.FIDONET.ORG