Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!sdd.hp.com!spool.mu.edu!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!rutgers!ucsd!nosc!baron!ryptyde!dant
From: dant@ryptyde.UUCP (Daniel Tracy)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy
Subject: Re: The Amiga's Future
Message-ID: <28@ryptyde.UUCP>
Date: 8 Jun 91 06:21:44 GMT
Article-I.D.: ryptyde.28
References: <5068@orbit.cts.com> <16647@darkstar.ucsc.edu> <1308@cbmger.UUCP>
Reply-To: dant@ryptyde.UUCP (Daniel Tracy)
Organization: Ryptyde Timesharing
Lines: 11

Responding to the following:

">>not enough power eh?  you call 50 Mhz not enough power?  show me a Mac with 50
>** [What C= computer runs at 50 Mhz? ] **
 
It's a quite normal policy to let some of upgrade and add-on features up
to the 3rd parties. This device *IS* available, it exists, so it may be
used as a pro argument for the Amiga."

Yes, but what's the argument? There are 50MHz 68030's AND 68040's for the Mac,
so what's the point? Is there a 50MHz 68040 available for the Amiga?