Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.advocacy Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!snorkelwacker.mit.edu!stanford.edu!neon.Stanford.EDU!torrie From: torrie@cs.stanford.edu (Evan Torrie) Subject: Re: The Amiga's Future Message-ID: <1991Jun9.182934.3206@neon.Stanford.EDU> Sender: torrie@neon.Stanford.EDU (Evan James Torrie) Organization: Computer Science Department, Stanford University, Ca , USA References: <5092@orbit.cts.com> <50205@ut-emx.uucp> <_n1H0j?q@cs.psu.edu> Date: Sun, 9 Jun 1991 18:29:34 GMT Lines: 34 melling@cs.psu.edu (Michael D Mellinger) writes: >In article <50205@ut-emx.uucp> awessels@ccwf.cc.utexas.edu (Allen Wessels) writes: > Oh, please. I can quite easily get a monitor that will display 36-120 dpi for > my machine. 72 dpi is an important number for the Mac, but it isn't the > only number. >Are you sure about this? I remember reading in a MacWorld a couple of >years ago where they mentioned that the Mac only supports 72dpi >monitors. Yes, in terms of WYSIWYG. It's possible to buy display systems with different dpi values (such as Sigma's L-View, which has 36, 45, 60, 72, 96 and 120 dpi) all switchable in software. But, the display doesn't get clearer - everything just gets bigger or smaller, thus losing your WYSIWYG display. This is because QuickDraw doesn't really know about resolution independent devices in the same way that say Postscript does. >Before True Type and ATM you only had bitmap fonts and they >must be done for every display resolution. Methinks 72dpi is >hardwired into the Mac. In terms of compatibility, it seems to be almost hardwired into the Mac. Although there have been some changes which make QuickDraw handle different resolutions better, I think it will require the release of the post-Mac machine (next year?) to really eliminate this problem. -- ------------------------------------------------------------------------------ Evan Torrie. Stanford University, Class of 199? torrie@cs.stanford.edu "Apes evolved from creationists" - seen on a bumper sticker.