Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!corton!mirsa!taloa!taloa.unice.fr!beust
From: beust@taloa.unice.fr (Cedric Beust)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.misc
Subject: Re: Gomf is CPU greedy!
Message-ID: <232@taloa.unice.fr>
Date: 7 Jun 91 14:56:41 GMT
References: <223@taloa.unice.fr> <1991Jun3.171023.13315@odin.diku.dk>
Sender: news@taloa.unice.fr
Reply-To: beust@taloa.unice.fr
Organization: University of Nice Sophia-Antipolis
Lines: 26
Nntp-Posting-Host: taloa.unice.fr

In article <1991Jun3.171023.13315@odin.diku.dk>, bombadil@diku.dk (Kristian Nielsen) writes:

: 
:   How did you obtain this figure? If you used Xoper (which is reasonable,
: since it is in many ways an excelent and very useful program), note that it
: doesn't count cpu time, but instead the number of task switches. But more
: important, if you didn't use Xoper, what did you use? Is it PD / Freeware / 
: Shareware? I really miss an accurate means of timing the cpu-usage of my
: programs.

     I used a ps written by a friend of mine. I wanted to ask him how
     he counted the percentage but didn't have time to do so. I didn't
     think of using XOper, though. I'll try this ASAP.

     If people are interested in this ps, I'll upload it to ab20.

     Is there an ultimate way of evaluating CPU time on the Amiga?

+------------------------------------------------------------------------+
| Cedric BEUST                                     University of Nice    |
| INET: beust@taloa.unice.fr                       $whoami               |
| UUCP: llaor.unice.fr!arkonis!beust               god (personal alias)  |
|                   -- "To be, or not to be...",                         |
|                      That is illogical, captain!                       |
|                                     -- Spock                           |
+------------------------------------------------------------------------+