Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!cs.utexas.edu!wuarchive!uunet!mcsun!ukc!stl!crosfield!jc From: jc@crosfield.co.uk (jerry cullingford) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.multimedia Subject: Re: CDTV titles on an A500? Message-ID: <10193@suns7.crosfield.co.uk> Date: 6 Jun 91 08:33:12 GMT References: <1991Jun3.054319.10135@news.iastate.edu> <1991Jun3.060223.8266@cs.mcgill.ca> <1991Jun4.011109.4290@news.iastate.edu> Reply-To: jc@crosfield.co.uk (jerry cullingford) Followup-To: comp.sys.amiga.multimedia Organization: Crosfield Electronics, Hemel Hempstead, United Kingdom. Lines: 15 In article <1991Jun4.011109.4290@news.iastate.edu> taab5@isuvax.iastate.edu writes: > > You just proved my point. I think Commodore may be pushing CDTV >software developers to avoid using code in this extra 256K, and to >stay within the original 256K of 1.3 ROM. Sorry, I don't think this can be right - surely, if C= didn't want people to use it, then they wouldn't have put it in? Why waste ROM space and development effort if you don't want people to use it? A lot simpler not to put it in the first place - that would make SURE they didn't use it :-) -- +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ | | Jerry Cullingford #include +44 442 230000 | ,-|-- | jc@crosfield.co.uk (was jc@cel.co.uk) or jc@cel.uucp x3203 | \_|__ +-----------------------------------------------------------------+ \___/