Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!decwrl!pa.dec.com!bacchus!mwm From: mwm@pa.dec.com (Mike (My Watch Has Windows) Meyer) Newsgroups: comp.sys.amiga.programmer Subject: Re: BindNames 1.0 Message-ID: Date: 7 Jun 91 17:10:10 GMT References: <6037@walking.pub.uu.oz.au> <22242@cbmvax.commodore.com> Sender: news@pa.dec.com (News) Organization: Missionaria Phonibalonica Lines: 39 In-Reply-To: daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com's message of 7 Jun 91 11:01:11 GMT In article <22242@cbmvax.commodore.com> daveh@cbmvax.commodore.com (Dave Haynie) writes: >What I want to know, is there a new version available under 2.0? There really should be. When I spend less than 60 or 70 hours a week at C=, maybe I'll update it. Virtually all the bad pieces (eg, ugly hacks that were necessary to get around the non-existance of a couple OS calls) can go away under 2.0. [Enter introspection mode...] Hmm - do I really want Dave to take time away from building spiffy hardware to update his spiffy software? Hard call. Probably best if he does what he thinks is best. [Exit introspection mode...] If you're going to do it, I tweaked it to check for a "directory" argument, defaulting ty sys:names. That way, I can move the names directory off the WB partition, so that something I don't have to worry about clobbering it on OS udpates. >Or (even better)does 2.0 support this sort of feature directly Not that I know of. I couldn't find it either. Howe >(It's a brilliant Idea) Thanks. I still use it. Ditto, for both.