Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!bonnie.concordia.ca!uunet!elroy.jpl.nasa.gov!ucla-cs!ucivax!orion.oac.uci.edu!ucsd!network.ucsd.edu!bjustin
From: bjustin@network.ucsd.edu (BIll Justin)
Newsgroups: comp.sys.mac.hypercard
Subject: HyperCard 2.1/2.0
Keywords: HyperCard, Home Stack
Message-ID: <5436@network.ucsd.edu>
Date: 6 Jun 91 21:33:19 GMT
Organization: University of California, San Diego
Lines: 27

Hi!

I recently upgraded to HyperCard 2.1, using the application and Home
stack that came with System 7.0.  The Home Stack, however, is a
much slimmed-down version compared to the "developers" Home Stack
that shipped with the full version of HyperCard 2.0v2.

What would happen if I used the 2.0v2 Home Stack in place of the
"abbreviated" Home Stack that came with 2.1?  I'm not using this on
an LC or IIsi, so I don't care about losing the "audio" stacks 
referenced by the Home Stack.

On the other hand, perhaps there is some important code I'd be
losing by using the 2.0v2 Home Stack.  *I* sure don't know!

Please send answers/advice to my e-mail address:

Internet:   bjustin@ucsd.edu
AppleLink:  bjustin@ucsd.edu@INTERNET#


Thanks!

Bill Justin
Dept. of Biology
University of California, San Diego
.