Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!think.com!spool.mu.edu!munnari.oz.au!metro!mama!andy
From: andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman)
Newsgroups: comp.unix.internals
Subject: Re: Shared libraries are not necessary
Keywords: X11 silliness
Message-ID: <1991Jun9.104502.2167@research.canon.oz.au>
Date: 9 Jun 91 10:45:02 GMT
Article-I.D.: research.1991Jun9.104502.2167
References: <300@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> <9659@sail.LABS.TEK.COM> <301@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> <1991Jun7.050655.27873@ux1.cso.uiuc.edu> <311@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp>
Sender: andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman)
Reply-To: andy@research.canon.oz.au (Andy Newman)
Organization: Canon Information Systems Research Australia
Lines: 9

In article <311@titccy.cc.titech.ac.jp> mohta@necom830.cc.titech.ac.jp (Masataka Ohta) writes:
>When you are writing a program, or drawing a picture, you often concentrate
>on a single application. Then, unless you are running something like xeyes,
>there is only one "actively running" process.

...and a clock, and a mail minder, and a manual browser, a couple of
performance monitors, a calendar manager, etc, etc... Soon adds up.
-- 
Andy Newman (andy@research.canon.oz.au)