Path: utzoo!utgpu!news-server.csri.toronto.edu!rpi!zaphod.mps.ohio-state.edu!swrinde!cs.utexas.edu!asuvax!ncar!pvi!todd
From: todd@pvi.UUCP (Todd Bradley x293)
Newsgroups: comp.windows.ms
Subject: Re: WINQVT
Keywords: QVT bashing
Message-ID: <778@pvi.UUCP>
Date: 6 Jun 91 14:54:31 GMT
References: <1991Jun4.191003.6564@minyos.xx.rmit.oz.au> <mr.676135350@ogre>
Reply-To: todd@boulder.Colorado.EDU (Todd Bradley x293)
Distribution: comp
Organization: Precision Visuals Inc., Boulder, Colorado
Lines: 27

In article <mr.676135350@ogre> mr@ogre.cica.indiana.edu (Michael Regoli) writes:
>
>While we're on the subject of WinQVT (and have been through several
>recent postings), are we certain that with all the griping about
>version 4.65 (the most recent on cica.cica.indiana.edu
>[129.79.20.22]), that 4.65 is the *most recent* version QPC Software
>is putting out?  Are registered users using version 5.xx or something?
>
>I just hate seeing all this bashing of QPC Software (specifically
>winQVT) when it may or may not be justified...
>

I just got my registered version in the mail two days ago, and yes,
it is version 4.65, just like the shareware version but with a manual.
As far as the QPC Software bashing goes--I'm not sure it does any
good to complain here, as I got the feeling that they aren't connected
to the net anyhow (please prove me wrong).  There are certainly many
things to complain about the software, but it would be more productive
to complain to the vendor directly.

Todd.


-- 
Todd Bradley (extension AXE)         Disclaimers are for wimps who have
Supreme Ruler of The Galaxy          some sort of job security.
Precision Visuals, Inc.  Boulder, CO (303) 530-9000